41
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2026
41 points (100.0% liked)
askchapo
23308 readers
244 users here now
Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.
Rules:
-
Posts must ask a question.
-
If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.
-
Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.
-
Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS

Marxism is not Utopian. Marx's whole point of writing was that he wanted to prove that socialism is not Utopian. The socialists and communists before Marx were Utopian.
It is the conservatives and liberals who are the utopians and idealists. As you pointed out, utopianism is when you have vague immaterial goals. A liberal will look you directly in the eyes and say that their goals are "freedom" and "democracy". Those are not real things. Those things are immaterial and cannot be measured. These words don't even have concrete meaning.
Workers owning the means of production has a material definition. It is not utopian. It is a material goal that can be worked towards and achieved.
The reason that reactionaries say that Socialism is utopian is because they don't want it to happen. Liberals know that socialism is good and achievable; they want preserve the exploitation of capitalism.
Right I was probably using utopian losely, in the "A utopia to me is society that doesn't suck ass" way rather than the textbook way
My comment was my answer to the question in the title. I was not correcting you. The comment is what I would say to people who think "people who think that making things better is naive and delusional". I think people who believe in concepts such as "freedom" and "democracy" are naive and delusional.
Ooooh I get it now!
ty ty