470
We don’t just need electric cars, we need fewer cars - Greenpeace International
(www.greenpeace.org)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2026
470 points (95.7% liked)
Europe
11765 readers
1121 users here now
News and information from Europe 🇪🇺
(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)
Rules (2024-08-30)
- This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
- No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
- Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
- No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
- Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
- If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
- Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
- Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
- No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
- Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.
(This list may get expanded as necessary.)
Posts that link to the following sources will be removed
- on any topic: Al Mayadeen, brusselssignal:eu, citjourno:com, europesays:com, Breitbart, Daily Caller, Fox, GB News, geo-trends:eu, news-pravda:com, OAN, RT, sociable:co, any AI slop sites (when in doubt please look for a credible imprint/about page), change:org (for privacy reasons), archive:is,ph,today (their JS DDoS websites)
- on Middle-East topics: Al Jazeera
- on Hungary: Euronews
Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com
(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)
Ban lengths, etc.
We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.
If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.
If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I did that too when I lived in Copenhagen. And it's also the fastest way to get around.
But now I live in the countryside, and here we absolutely need cars, but everyone on my road drive electric, and half of us have solar panels. So in that way I don't think our environmental footprint is worse than living in an apartment in the city. Because we to a large degree are energy self sustained.
The problems of car dependency go beyond carbon, though - it's also about road danger, space demand, micro plastics, the exclusion from society of people who can't afford cars, the exclusion of disabled people, etc etc. Changing the engine doesn't address these and we need to work towards reducing reliance on this form of transport
IMO the best way to get rid of cars (in your own life) is to not live on the countryside.
Not everyone can afford a place in a large city.
They could if they weren't paying for a car note, excise tax, parking, gasoline, repairs, and maintenance...
Likely have a shorter commute to work (since no traffic), too, and thus a better work/life balance.
But...you likely lose out on recreational perks of suburban and rural life, like gardening, since you have very limited space for it. On the flipside, though, there are usually more recreational options and "third places" readily available.
The cost of having a car is much less than the cost of renting an apartment in a large city. And you usually don't need to pay for parking in rural areas, everyone has a driveway or a garage, and many places have free parking.
Don't forget some people must have new vehicles (and can't be trusted to maintain the vehicles themselves) so they lease a new car every three years
The barrier to entry is prohibitive. So many people are living paycheck to paycheck, a down payment on a home within walking/cycling distance of their workplace is a pipedream.
Even if they could, with how large cities are, it's unlikely it'll be close to where they work.
The solution is always mass transit: even a simple bus, as long as it's comfortable, reasonably fast and timely will do wonders. Trains and subway, even better.
I found a nice house for sale that's literally across the street from my new job. They only want 4.7 million for it.
Ten years ago it was worth 500k. Like what the fuck.
Mass transit doesn't solve the problem of high rent prices, unfortunately.
By itself, no, it will not solve the problem, but it does help because it distributes the housing pressure over a larger area.
Forget the superhero approach. If you're looking for one solution to fix everything, you'll live life as a very disappointed person. There are no magical fixes to big problems - it's one small step at a time, until their compounding effect starts to chip away at the problem.
Not to disagree, but better only have those problems and not have those problems and fossil fuel emissions. Working towards that goal is much more sensible in the places with high density populations.