371

Just over a year ago, David Hogg, then the newly-minted vice chair of the Democratic National Committee, found himself unceremoniously pushed out after he called on the party to back primary challengers to unseat members of a moribund establishment.

Now, as progressives notch victory after victory against the party’s conservative old guard and are once again galvanizing young voters thought to have been lost, the 26-year-old reformer says it proves he was right all along.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago

I wish moderate libs would understand that the demsocs are helping to move the Overton window further left, which is a good thing because it's moved way too far to the right due to the ratchet effect. I mean, Jesus, do libs not know how to negotiate? You know compromise will be necessary, so start left of the position you want to end up at. You start at democratic socialism but you end up at a relatively modest, European style social democracy. If that's too far left for you, well, you might as well just cut the crap and join the Republican party now.

[-] nickiwest@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

2020s Democrats are mostly 1980s Republicans that are more okay with diversity.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

*certain diversity

The second half of this statement is debatable

[-] MJKee9@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

As someone who lived in the 80s, it isn't debatable. A gay person outside of highly liberal cities, had to hide being gay or they were at a severe disadvantage. That is now true in much fewer locations.

[-] AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml -2 points 14 hours ago

EEU social democracy is dying quickly too. It did not work. There is no left. Ever since the Reagan and the fall of the USSR and the "third way", the so called left does not believe in anything any more. Only power for themselves and taking certain positions to get elected.

History is full of examples of democratic socialists getting slaughtered, literally. The US is responsible for much of it. The plutocrats are definitely going to try to kill them or put them in camps.

[-] Malyca@lemmy.zip 2 points 13 hours ago

Left is incompatible with capitalism

[-] mcv@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 hours ago

Everything decent is incompatible with capitalism.

The party is lead by people who would be Republicans if they happened to live in a red state. They don't actually believe in anything. They just seek power. People like this become Republicans in red states and Democrats in blue states. Centrist wafflers in purple states.

[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works -1 points 17 hours ago

Does it make more sense if you view the Democratic Party as controlled opposition?

[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

Why would moderate libs car about "going left." They want to support the "just world" they grew up in and ensure they are never made uncomfortable.

this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2026
371 points (98.9% liked)

politics

30708 readers
1501 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS