572
Call em out (thelemmy.club)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] KassioAug@piefed.social 36 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

That's a stupid take. If you 'normalize shaming' (which, to be fair, is quite common nowadays unfortunately) for things you don't agree with, you will make your own life miserable, and people will hate you for a good reason.

Sure you should talk to friends and family when you see them acting problematic, nothing wrong with that. But shaming people for things you THINK you understand (when you most certainly don't) is the fastest way to push people away.

[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 hours ago

"side piece" being problematic in itself, there are many who would use this wrongly.

A family who sees someone with a partner they don't approve of, the extremely religious not accepting divorce/remarriage etc

[-] WaxRhetorical@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago

Don't worry, a lot of these people are already very vocal about this, they don't need some post online to start being shitty.

[-] chrislowles@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 hours ago

And isn't the entire internet just a giant indifferent shaming machine now? Like I get the desire to right wrongs and whatnot but it's not like the general consensus around cheating or being a deadbeat is positive.

[-] GardenGeek@europe.pub 1 points 1 hour ago

Shame was from the beginning of man kind one of the most powerful tools of the community/ society to hedge in antisocial behaviors.

This being said there first needs to be sentient consensus on what is anti social behavior shared within the affected community... and that's what we're apparently lacking currently. Robbing millions of americans of the means to life peaceful and fullfilling lives and raping kids seems to acceptable to at least a third of the population.

[-] qevlarr@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Exactly. Ethics can differ. Of course you can say something privately if there is a real problem, but this is some 1950s bullshit I don't want to go back to

[-] Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 59 minutes ago)

dude the '50s people just gossipied behind eachothers backs, and hid any problematic behaivor under a rug so no one found out.

Their silence on real issues is why generational trauma keeps going.

what you mean go back to that shit? calling it out is the exact opposite of the fifties.

[-] qevlarr@lemmy.world 1 points 8 minutes ago* (last edited 5 minutes ago)

Yes, that's true, but I meant about restrictive social norms. One person's reprehensible norm breaking is another person's struggle for recognition. But you're right, publicly calling out stuff is not what I meant

this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2026
572 points (96.7% liked)

People Twitter

10288 readers
1483 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major celebrity, figure or any politician. If you replace the "x" at their site with xcancel (so it beomes xcancel.com), and you're not on mobile, it will save video. https://web.archive.org/save is another great option. Archive.is is no longer recommended because they remove/alter content.
  7. If a tweet (or similar) makes a statement of fact, either mark it as "satire" in the body or provide the original source link backing up the statement

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS