541
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] undefinedTruth@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

Second that. After all all my open repositories are all either licenced under GPL or MIT, so complaining would be a kind of hypocritical.

[-] gnutrino@programming.dev 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

GPL is dodgy to be included in training data for AIs that are then used to generate non-openaource code tbh. Even MIT loses the attribution it's supposed to have once laundered through AI...

Speaking as someone that's been into FOSS for a long time, it does piss me off how quickly copyright got thrown under the bus the moment it became inconvenient for people with money.

[-] undefinedTruth@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Yes, but what HuggingFace is doing here is the distribution of a data set. And so long the data set itself is open that doesn't conflict with GPL. HuggingFace is not responsible about how others use that data set.

Whether LLMs themselves violate copyright for being trained on MIT or GPL code is an entirely different discussion.

this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2026
541 points (99.1% liked)

Programmer Humor

32572 readers
1457 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS