67
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2026
67 points (98.6% liked)
Slop.
883 readers
260 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
It only makes sense in that context. Why would you draw the borders there? Because you were trying to create a functional Soviet republic, so it gets a nice river basin. If the borders had been drawn up in a more adversarial context Russia would have just kept more or all of it.
It's actually much more complex. Donbass had a slight Ukrainian majority, but it was mostly rural. And also Ukrainians were (and still are, however much Ukrainian government insists on opposite) very heterogenous. And also there were (and still are!) plenty of people without clear preference for one of the national identities.
I was under the impression it was more than Donbas had a large industrial sector and industrial workers were the most pro Bolshevik demographic, the rest of Ukraine was mostly small holdings farmers so Lenin was essentially trying to gerrymander Ukraine into being more pro socialist.