820
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago

"Seizing" just means "not giving copius amounts of tax cuts" nowadays.

[-] BillyGruff82@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago

Nah, they need bag-holders too.

[-] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 3 days ago
[-] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Oh that's actually REALLY cool news.

[-] msage@programming.dev 8 points 3 days ago

No it's not.

Public will be left holding the bag.

Those companies are bleeding money everywhere, as soon as it hits open market they will crash and burn.

Let the rich keep those ''''assets''''. It's all stolen anyway.

[-] BlaestEgnen@feddit.dk 5 points 3 days ago

The text doesn't read buy, it reads transfer. Basically force all AI companies to issue one extra share per share currently held and handed over to the fund.

Assume they could be non voting shares, but have them be paid the same dividends as other shareholders

But I don't get why this would be preferred to increasing capital tax or company taxes

this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2026
820 points (99.3% liked)

Work Reform

16906 readers
69 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS