167
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Juice@midwest.social 6 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Intuitively, it makes sense: consume more stuff = less stuff to consume. But its kinda like comparing the credit and finances of a single household to the credit and finances of an entire nation. Its an insidious little slight of hand, that tricks people up because its legit just really hard to conceive of national industry.

That's why I like the groceries example, because it's just as obvious. Connecting wages to unemployment is kinda tricky still, but like we just went through covid-inflation so maybe that helps connect the dots

this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2026
167 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

876 readers
551 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS