447
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2026
447 points (94.6% liked)
World News
57129 readers
1726 users here now
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Can you explain the math?
If you have 10,000 soldiers and on average the life expectancy is of 30 minutes then in 30 minutes you will have no soldiers because they all died. This is of course not the case, but works out if you average it out over a longer period.
This means Russia has to send 10,000 new troops every 30 minutes. That is 48 full replacements of their standing army every day.
48 x 10,000 = 480,000
480,000 x 30 x 6 = 86 millions
Sorry I had made some mistake in the previous calculation, still a huge number though.
The question is probably how they define "on the battlefield" (Where does the battlefield start?)
I have no idea, I interpret it as people deployed.
There's also the possibility that they refer to soldiers actively attacking a Ukrainian position, which would be a strange way to word it. But in that case it wouldn't be so surprising: I can believe you have about half an hour to live when you're rushing towards machine guns.
Where do you get the 10000 troop number per 30 minutes? Seems absurdly high. I'd personally put it somewhere between 10-25
If they have 10,000 soldiers on the battlefield and the average life expectancy of a soldier is 30 minutes then on average they will lose 10,000 soldiers every 30 minutes.
If the life expectancy of a soldier is 30 minutes then I'd expect that on average their whole standing army will be dead in 30 minutes.
It is an absurdly high number, just like it is absurd to say that average life expectancy on the front is 30 minutes.
You didn't answer my question and I'm starting to think you really don't understand the numbers or this article
It's an arbitrary guess.
What's the correct understanding of the numbers?
When a foot soldier gets to an active conflict zone, on average they get hit (not necessarily killed, casualty is also wounded) every 30 minutes. This does not count in drone operators, logistics, etc., but the most dangerous job in the army - front lines. If you see some of the footage from the front, then this does not seem that extreme. That's why it's called meatgrinder
What is the main unit?
A soldier? So soldiers stay for 6 hours and are hit 12 times and all wounds are just flesh wounds and they stay until they are fatally shot after 3 month?
A hit every 30 minutes otherwise means 48 hits per day, 48 wounded or dead soldiers. 48 soldiers of what?
All soldiers? Russia has 48 casualities per day?
A company of 130 people loses 48 per day?
A battalion of 500 people loses 48 per day
A regiment of 1500 people loses 48 per day?
...what. Are you AI? I genuinely don't understand the logic behind what you say and why you say it. Why would they all be flesh wounds? Why would the time be static as if it's not anywhere between 1 and 60 minutes, even higher? Why 3 months?
I think they're talking about Russian war. Meaning Russia.
Why 48 per day? Are you saying Russia replenishes the front lines at a rate of 1 soldier per 30 minutes? Again, what are you talking about and why are you saying this.
Yesterday, the reported casualty count for Russia was 1400, this implies on average 46 soldiers per 30 minutes. Higher than my own guess, but still a legit sounding number.
The only number I got from the article is the following.
The rest is made up data to show such number is absurd. Other numbers may be correct.
You can't prove something being absurd with made-up data, especially when that made-up number not correlating with real life numbers, which like I said before, to me looks like somewhere between 10 and 25, not 10000, which is also made-up, but at least to me it actually makes sense. Your number does not.
There are between 10 and 25 Russians deployed in the battlefield? Feels like in that case a Ukrainian soldier could easily slip by more or less anywhere and get anywhere they wish in Russia.
Frontline is 12,000 kilometers, with 25 soldiers in the battlefield that is 480 kilometers between each soldier in the battlefield.
Replenished, not deployed at all times. Very different meaning. Now that I took a look at recent casualties, the number is probably double of that.
If their number of soldiers is much higher than 50 and they are on average losing all of their deployed troops every half an hour they will eventually end up with just 50 soldiers on the front. And they'd lose those 50 soldiers in a few hours anyway. As long as the above statement is true.
I have no doubts they're probably not replenishing much more than 50 soldiers per day. I have doubts the life expectancy of a soldier is 30 minutes.
1000+
Well, that is quite a larger number than 50
I think you're confusing per day/per hour/per those 30 minutes.
Maybe, but still does it make sense to you this life expectancy of 30 minutes? They're reinforcing 1000 per day and those 1000 generally die in 30 minutes.
I mean, the numbers are there. I frequent combat footage communities and it's honestly not that shocking. They have been reporting daily ever since war began, and by now it has pretty much peaked on troop casualty count per day which is why Russia is also recruiting much more aggressively, even just snatching people from the street like we've seen in many videos. They're obviously becoming quite desperate in their attempts to replenish the lost troops.
Ukraine publishes the number of Russian casualties every day (both wounded and killed) and it's usually between 600 and 1000. Not every soldier on the "battlefield" is used as assault infantry on the frontline.
The statement says that as soon as a soldier gets to the battlefield they have a life expectancy of 20/30 minutes.
I'm not using these calculations to extrapolate the number of deaths in Russia, I'm using it to prove the statement makes no sense.
I don't know why it is not correct, but the number is too high for the statement to be correct.
Yeah, and in medieval times everyone only lived to 30 and then just died... /s
No, but you'd expect that every 30 years the number of deaths is the same as the world population.
I did point out this does not work unless averages over longer periods of time. 6 months is in my opinion quite long when compared to 30 minutes.
If you have any actual critique of the maths I'm showing, please bring it up and we may discuss that.
Only if population size is stable, births equal deaths, age distribution is stable and so on. Otherwise it doesn't really add up. The point is: Average doesn't mean their entire army is gone in 30 minutes. Some make it 2 minutes, others may survive for several months.
Yes, I do understand statistics. Do you?
Sure, things will likely drift a little bit away from the average. Moreover the average is just an estimate.
However, assuming the average as correct and the population more or less stable that is the number you get. Let's add a 20% margins for variable effects, that is still 70 million deaths.