298

Nearly half of all Democrats in the House of Representatives voted Wednesday to cut off US military aid to Israel, a move that underscored a dramatic shift away from the US support the Mideast ally has enjoyed for nearly 60 years.

While House lawmakers ultimately rejected Rep. Thomas Massie's (R-Ky.) amendment to a national security spending bill that would have eliminated the $3.3 billion in annual foreign military financing provided to Israel’s military, the details of the vote were viewed as an encouraging sign by defenders of Palestine and the rule of law.

Massie and 103 Democrats voted for the measure, while 215 Republicans and 98 Democrats rejected it. The overall tally was 104 for, 314 against, and 10 "present" votes, with 9 absences.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 55 points 1 day ago

And it proves what many have been saying. The primaries are the time for you to cast your protest vote, not the generals.

[-] falcunculus@jlai.lu 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Sorry citizen, your time for self expression and democracy, as materialized by a single vote for one preset option you had no voice towards, in an election rigged by the party brass, has passed. Please go back to being an obedient worker drone. See you in two years, which is plenty often enough for a satisfactory democracy!

[-] luciferofastora@feddit.org 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You (general you, not you personally) can and should express your opinion in other ways as well. It's just the price / collateral damage that's far higher in the general election. You'll express frustration at some issues and sacrifice others in the process, without achieving much.

You won't tear down that pyramid by ripping the golden cover off the top. Attack the base, shatter the bricks holding up the corrupt tip, and the whole thing will start shaking.

Notice that the party brass didn't throw as much of a tantrum about the lost presidency as they did about the slew of progressives unseating "safe" candidates in primaries. That's where they actually start to worry.

Votes need to be a tool for establishing public consensus, but that doesn't mean they have to be the only tool.

The Master's Tools Will Never Dismantle the Master's House

[-] luciferofastora@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

Some tools can be appropriated, and some tools will be needed to build a new house. Don't discard them all.

Voting alone may not be enough, but it's a useful way to communicate public opinion. Establishing the consensus that enough people are behind you encourages participation in direct action, and building democratic legitimacy helps make your changes stick.

You probably need more than votes to achieve change, but you'll need them to make it last.

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 day ago

Hard to vote in primaries when they coronate candidates.

[-] 13igTyme@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago

Like I've told others like you. That literally only happened once.

[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 0 points 16 hours ago

Hey can I borrow money from you once

[-] frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Furthering the need to improve the system even more.

Having the Ranked Choice voting system that NYC, Maine, and Alaska have would make it so primaries and even general elections are won by the people that are most representative of their constituents, rather than just corporate backed donors. Every state can vote in some form of alternative voting system. It’s such an important change factor that red states have been actively trying to ban Ranked Choice voting.

[-] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Voting for who you want in the primary is not "protest voting." It's simply voting for who you want.

If the establishment doesn't wan't to be democratic about the primary, then that's on them.

[-] quantumcrop@lemmy.today 0 points 1 day ago

I'll vote for their shitty centrist pick as soon as Schumer apologises for not endorsing or even acknowledging Mamdani after he won the democatic nomination.

Vote blue no matter who is a two way street buckaroo.

[-] MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 day ago

Fuck you, you dumb piece of shit.

this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2026
298 points (99.0% liked)

politics

30435 readers
3150 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS