21
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2026
21 points (74.4% liked)
politics
30415 readers
2849 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Second to the sheer billionaire wealth inequality, he and his inner circle of enablers fucked us all. Dumbass would've been praised eternally if he got us out of covid and committed to being a 1 term president as he stated. Then he REALLY should've withdrawn like in a week following that June debate. But no, he dragged it out and really fucked the party over, including Harris.
No, he never said he would only run one term. Anonymous people said that they thought he would, and when journalists immediately asked the Biden campaign they denied it. For some reason people take as gospel what anonymous people thought someone else would do.
Nope. In 2024, Biden himself confirmed it:
How do you get a one term promise out of any of that? Whether he runs one term or two terms he would still be handing things off to younger politicians. It's almost tautological considering how old he was.
What else could he possibly mean by that, especially when he's discussing in retrospect and openly acknowledging it? Seems awfully obtuse. But here, let me try spelling it out just a bit more, and beyond that I'm done trying:
Your references to 2019 are irrelevant. It was already reported by Politico that four people speaking regularly with VP Biden had privately told the mhe was unlikely to run for reelection in 2024 -- this was likely to assuage concerns of liability for his age when that time came.
There was a particularly famous press conference Q&A of his, July 11, 2024.
The report asks, "in 2020 you referred yourself as being a 'bridge candidate for a younger, fresher generation of Democratic leaders' and I wanted to know what changed"
Biden's response, in acknowledgement stated, "What changed was...[reasons]... and I want to get that finished."
Naturally, if using the tiniest bit of logic, you can surmise two things:
(1) If "bridge" candidate doesn't mean that, then he could've and would've simply said, "I still intend to be a bridge candidate, after two terms, which was always the plan!" -- never did he say this.
(2) He concluded answering the question that he needed more time, implying he wanted his second term in order, "to get that finished."
If you're still not connecting the dots then I don't know what to tell you and I'll just chalk this up to either willful ignorance or rage-bait.
The Politico article quoted several anonymous people and in it they only shared their personal opinion and not anything that Biden said. So your description of that article is wrong, you are lying.
I'll provide quotes:
Anonymous personal opinion.
Anonymous personal opinion.
Anonymous personal opinion.
But none of these are relevant, because shortly after the campaign responded:
Not anonymous and an official statement from the campaign.
So I repeat myself:
Almost completely agree with you. Harris had a good amount of fucking herself though.
We dems have a long and storied history of fucking ourselves.
It's sadly such an uphill battle these days -- especially in the post-CU era -- that requires once-in-a-generation candidates like Obama or Bernie to overcome the fucking cliff of an uneven playing-field. That Americans didn't see Trump for the existential threat he is, or that Harris was better in every conceivable way to me proves this
I think a lot of Americans did see Trump as an existential threat and that's why they voted for him. He was the "blow everything up" candidate, Harris was the "everything continues as it is" candidate.
This is literally the most charitable thing I can say about a subset of Trump voters. They actually did have a point there. A lot of people voted for Obama because he was the change candidate and this time around Trump was the change candidate. Almost entirely bad changes, of course, but some people were so desperate for change that they figured it was worth rolling the dice.
Just a subset of Trump voters, mind. Most of them were probably just awful people who saw a fellow awful person on the candidate and went "me like." But if a subset had decided not to vote for him we wouldn't be here now so they were significant.
That would be a reasonable argument a decade ago, before we knew exactly what he's about.
Voting Trump in 2016 is something bad that a person does.
Voting Trump in 2024 is something that a bad person does.
In one respect I can see why they'd think this from a point of ignorance, but also, that disgusts me so much. Accelerationists are always so willing to volunteer others for the chlorine shock treatment without their consent. Just look at the deaths wrought by Musk's DOGE alone that dwarfs Gaza and Ukraine, combined. Elections are so consequential.
Yup. The "you can't make an omelette without killing a whole bunch of people" mindset.
The annoying part is that it's not entirely wrong, IMO. At this point I think the best hope America has is for those Trump voters to feel the pain of the situation they have brought upon themselves, and for the Democrats to be pushed far enough to finally shake off the DNC establishment. America needs another Roosevelt at this point and there's no way someone like that would have got on the ballot or been elected under the past few decades' conditions.
Sure would have been nice if everyone had just been smart about all this and we hadn't got here to begin with, but we go to the ballot box with the electorate we have rather than the one we hope for.
Agreed. Now that Scrotus has removed all constraints on spending I expect this to come to a head very soon.
I’m incredibly disappointed that people were taken in by Trump a 3rd time. Since we’ve gotten this bad I imagine that the horror is going to have to visit these Trump voters personally, each and every one. Then and only then will they understand.
The trouble is that by the time they get it it’s going to be very bad here.