The term Tankie has a clear definition that Cowbee likes to ignore:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tankie Tankie is a pejorative label generally applied to authoritarian communists, especially those > who support or defend acts of repression by such regimes, their allies, or deny the > occurrence of the events thereof.

Join the lemmy.ml boycott today and help foster a better Lemmy-verse! No more posts, comments (except to counter their propaganda ofc!) or upvotes on any comms on the > Lemmy.ml instance! To make this easy you can do an instance block at Settings > Block Tab > Scroll to bottom > Input "lemmy.ml" and apply

And consider donating to individual instances instead.

Check the megathread for more!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 42 points 3 months ago (7 children)

Why can't anyone there give a "non-tankie" example of an actual communist organization that accomplished anything of note? I'm not talking about their local friends, but a movement, a country, whatever. There's never any example.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    I actually have gotten examples before. I've gotten completely warped ideas of Catalonia, Maknovist Ukraine, and the Kurds in Syria. And wouldn't you know it all three of those examples I've heard have been framed in the context of how they would have been successful movements but the dastardly tankies betrayed them at the last moment.

    It's deeply unserious. There are things to learn from those three examples but the romanticized fairy tale stuff just isn't useful. It's so absurd to me because baby brained liberals learned the exact opposite lesson from those historical examples. It's not "don't trust tankies" but the lesson is truly "do not trust the western powers, they're just using you as a wedge to disrupt their more powerful enemies."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments