107
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by cm0002@libretechni.ca to c/world@quokk.au
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] usernameunnecessary@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I was merely talking about trustworthiness, not about anything else. But you are right, there is no comparison between the levels of untrustworthiness of the two aggressors in the sentence versus the defending country. Iran has their own share of issues but there's no doubt as to who the bullies are in this specific case.

[-] mrdown@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

With the rhetoric of none are untrustworthy. It easy to blame both for the lack of solution which is a problem

[-] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago

Okay but they're not doing that so why bring that up?

[-] mrdown@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I think his framing allow the idea that iran is also an obstacle to peace while it only want return of the stolen assets and sanction relief and control of the straight so the usa can't backtrack from the deal

this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2026
107 points (100.0% liked)

World News

2267 readers
816 users here now

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS