23
submitted 1 day ago by wraekscadu@vargar.org to c/canada@lemmy.ca

Hey, sorry, I tried looking up a case study of this for myself, but couldn't find anything substantial. Do you guys have anything like this?

I'm wondering about the new pipeline purely from an economic sense.

Essentially stuff like:

  • Projected taxpayer funded dollars to build the entire thing (a projected bell curve of expenditure).
  • Projected oil demand, and price for the time that the pipeline remains operational.
  • Finally, a bell curve of ROI for us.

I know I know, the environmental damage this would do is horrible, blah blah blah. I agree. I just want to know if this is at the very least a good financial decision or not.

Again, I'm looking for actual quantitative projections. Not stuff like, "but Asia is moving toward renewables".

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DriftingLynx@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Depends on who you are... an O&G company? Nearly infinite as the public foots the infrastructure bill and you just see revenue.

But for the rest of us who's tax dollars are being spent on this insanity, it'll be zero or negative. All costs with negative benefits like less money for heathcare or road infrastructure.

this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2026
23 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

12129 readers
329 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS