▲ 44 ▼ Makes sense, America. The court of CNN and Politico thank you for your alliance (thelemmy.club) submitted 2 months ago by mrodri89@lemmy.zip to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world 113 comments fedilink hide all child comments Please tell me i'm not the only one who still finds this ridiculous and believes that only a court of law can determine guilt?
[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago (1 child) Why would he have those messages if what he says is true? If Platner is telling the truth, then those messages never existed. You're demanding Platner produce something that, according to his side, never existed in the first place. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) He doesn't deny the relationship with this woman. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (1 child) You're confusing "all texts" with "specific and relevant texts." Yes, Platner would have had texts with her. But the texts where she asked him not to come over, or accused him of rape, the actual damning stuff? None of that would exist if Platner is telling the truth. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Wren@lemmy.today 3 points 2 months ago Exactly, which means he could release his text history around the time of the alleged assault. If they were no damning texts between him and her around that time it would be evidence in his favor. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) He doesn't deny the relationship with this woman. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (1 child) You're confusing "all texts" with "specific and relevant texts." Yes, Platner would have had texts with her. But the texts where she asked him not to come over, or accused him of rape, the actual damning stuff? None of that would exist if Platner is telling the truth. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Wren@lemmy.today 3 points 2 months ago Exactly, which means he could release his text history around the time of the alleged assault. If they were no damning texts between him and her around that time it would be evidence in his favor. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (1 child) You're confusing "all texts" with "specific and relevant texts." Yes, Platner would have had texts with her. But the texts where she asked him not to come over, or accused him of rape, the actual damning stuff? None of that would exist if Platner is telling the truth. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Wren@lemmy.today 3 points 2 months ago Exactly, which means he could release his text history around the time of the alleged assault. If they were no damning texts between him and her around that time it would be evidence in his favor. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Wren@lemmy.today 3 points 2 months ago Exactly, which means he could release his text history around the time of the alleged assault. If they were no damning texts between him and her around that time it would be evidence in his favor. permalink fedilink source parent
