44
Makes sense, America. The court of CNN and Politico thank you for your alliance (thelemmy.club)
submitted 2 months ago by to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world
113 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Please tell me i'm not the only one who still finds this ridiculous and believes that only a court of law can determine guilt?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Again, Platner could release his side of the conversations. I wonder how much different his texts are from what his victim is saying about that night.

It is still evidence whether you want it to be or not.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] -2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Why would he have those messages if what he says is true? If Platner is telling the truth, then those messages never existed. You're demanding Platner produce something that, according to his side, never existed in the first place.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    He doesn't deny the relationship with this woman.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    You're confusing "all texts" with "specific and relevant texts."

    Yes, Platner would have had texts with her. But the texts where she asked him not to come over, or accused him of rape, the actual damning stuff? None of that would exist if Platner is telling the truth.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    Exactly, which means he could release his text history around the time of the alleged assault. If they were no damning texts between him and her around that time it would be evidence in his favor.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent