Please tell me i'm not the only one who still finds this ridiculous and believes that only a court of law can determine guilt?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 2 months ago (1 child)

Yeah, because they don't want a candidate with credible rape accusations. Seems pretty reasonable to me.

The outlet reported it reviewed text messages and interviewed people whom Racicot had previously told about the incident, including her therapist and an ex-boyfriend. The Hill

Rep. Ro Khanna rescinded his endorsement of Graham Platner and called the allegations "serious and credible".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Politico was the outlet. Text Messages screenshots can be fabricated. All the communication outside of those screenshots conveniently left out. And all other witnesses conveniently wanting to be remaining anonymous.

    I don't care if Bernie Sanders asked him to step down. They aren't a jury or a judge.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Oh, you're confused. This is a political process, not a judicial one. There's no "beyond a reasonable doubt" here, and this isn't the first issue with Platner.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] -2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    No im not confused. And i dont care about the previous allegation or this one until its presented before a judge and not the court of dumbass American media consumers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments