They still weren't valid targets and if you think they are, you have a "kill everyone with the tiniest arguable amount of associable guilt" approach to leftism.

It is a correct stance to say that donors to fascist causes are donors, that minorities are minorities, and an attempt to make a blanket equivocation of the two is part of what drives the cycle of violence.

It is a correct stance to say that there are varying levels of guilt in Zionist oppression, that individuals with discernible stances and impacts are better targets than a general population, and even that the typical Christian megachurch is more Zionistic, and more complicit in Isra*el's worst abuses, than the typical Reform synagogue is.

It is an incorrect stance to claim that "when you kill people, you make them less determined to do violence to you. I'm sure that poster would never claim that Hezbollah or Ansarallah, or the VNPA, or the Iraqi resistance (the list goes on), had a reduced ability to fight after being killed in greater numbers.

It is an incorrect stance to claim that "people change their minds and shy away when you kill them or threaten them, and they don't double down or find new ways around it". This is one of the few clear lessons in history. It applies to everyone, not just whatever historical forces you like best.

People go to a place of worship because they're looking for community, not because they select an ideal institution by analyzing all the history and political stances. Their biggest deciding factor is usually how close or accessible it is, not whether they took a certain stance 85 years ago or what their financials look like. Perhaps someone who's never been religious wouldn't understand this, but then they should refrain from talking authoritatively about it.

Hamas and PIJ operatives on October 7 were like "we are Muslims, we will keep you safe and treat you honorably" to those who had directly benefitted from oppressing them, or worse.
Random fediverse members with a penchant for violence are like "yeah if a Jew in America went to the wrong synagogue, they deserve to die".

I would have said all this therein, but a power-gluttonous stranger to green grass (no one who does any actual organizing IRL cultivates these opinions) banned me, not for what side someone takes, but for someone on their own side having anything less than total bloodthirst.

My count of people on this instance who don't understand this and choose a simplistic "just kill everyone in opposition" increases to 4. Maybe there's a pattern of why we didn't see the growth that other instances did.