Pay your employees a living wage
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 24 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (18 children)

If a waiter does not make enough in tips for minimum wage, the businesses is legally required to cover the difference. So let's stop with the guilt trip. Part of the problem stems from the same servers that oppose doing away with the tip system because they make so much more from it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    Ha.

    I've served plenty of time in the food service industry and I can tell you that the number of restaurants who actually "make up the difference" to minimum wage in the absence of tips is zero. Even though it's a legal requirement, I've never set foot in a restaurant that actually does this.

    No one tracks cash tips. And yes, the servers like it that way. Because cash tips are money under the table and they're not taxed. But your boss ain't paying you jack shit over that $2.13 an hour because who is going to prove it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I believe you when you say this.

    But why is that the customer's problem? You have legal protection should you wish to pursue it. The fact that you accept the situation shouldn't mean it's on everyone else to support it.

    I grew up in the US so I'm annoyed by tipping but personally wouldn't boycott it. But i would also have no issue with those that do. My biggest gripe is this push for 18-20% as a new normal.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    $7.25/hour isnt enough to live on. Servers still need the tips to survive. That's $1,160 gross per month with 4-40 hour weeks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (5 children)

    and it's federal law, so applies in all states

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    If it were enforced, it would

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    unenforced laws in a country are nobody's problem but that country's. One can't blame tourists for one's own lack of enforcement.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Even if it was enforced to the letter of the law, that's still only $1,160 gross wages per month (assuming the employee got a full 40 hours for 4 weeks). Federal law stipulates that workers are paid at least US minimum wage which is $7.25/hour. Federal law doesnt say anything about guaranteeing the raised minimum wage rate set by any state legislature.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    You seemed to say that federal law provides protection for underpaid workers, and I pointed out that it doesn't provide that protection. You then blame the country for the lack of protection, which seems tantamount to victim-blaming here - you seem to imply they shouldn't be working where they are.

    I agree that the tourists are not the cause of the issue - but are places that engage in this practice places you want to patronize?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago* (1 child)

    If a waiter does not make enough in tips for minimum wage, the businesses is legally required to cover the difference. So let’s stop with the guilt trip.

    OH YEA, cuz that worker who gets paid $2.13 per hour is totally going to be able to afford pay a couple thousand in legal fees to take the billion dollar "Mega-Restaurant Corp" to court and wait the 6 months to several years to get judgement and gather their back pay of $200.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment