There is no shortage of interest in the voting patterns of the white working class. Of particular note is how this group – especially since the sea change of the 1960s – finds themselves so consistently on the wrong side of progressive politics. The national preoccupation with the white working class’s affinity for rightwing conservatism has propagated countless bestselling books, long reads and think pieces that are often mawkish or condescending or both. Their almost exclusively centrist white elite authors plead for us to understand how those in the white working class feel “left behind”, and that they turned hard right because Democrats didn’t tend to their economic anxieties. These pieces pose questions like “Why is the working class leaving the Democratic party?” and equate the term “working class” with whiteness, ignoring any explanation for why the Black working classes – which suffered far more economic angst and Covid-related disparities in the last decade – continue to vote solidly blue.
But after three presidential elections in which non-college-educated white voters (the most functional definition we have for this group) have overwhelmingly supported Donald Trump, journalists and researchers are now questioning if these voters will go Maga again in the 2026 midterms. Pollsters speculate that they are breaking with Trump: his approval ratings have recently dipped below 50% with non-college-educated whites, as their economics are no better off under Trump 2.0 – down 14 points in the last 15 months.
This handwringing about the marriage between Trump and his least affluent white voters blindly looks towards changing economic tides to explain past voting and forecast upcoming elections. It’s a historically misguided assumption, however, that the downturn drove the white working class into Trump’s arms, and that his failure to redress their conditions will be the cause of their potential breakup. Generations of voters in the US have proven that in times of expanding democracy and the perceived challenge to their resources posed by other races, the white working class had the choice to side with the conditions of all working people but repeatedly aligned with white elites who shored up their racial anxieties with state-backed force against their perceived competition. That’s because, as past politics reveal, the white working class has repeatedly prioritized racial power as their political priority. Even when siding with conservatives has cost them the most economically, they continue to measure their gains racially.
16
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2026
16 points (100.0% liked)
Politics
11544 readers
91 users here now
In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
- Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
- Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
- Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
- Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
That's a real simplification of DuBois who conducted incredibly detailed analysis of all the different classes created by and affected by chattel slavery, civil war, reconstruction, and counter-reconstruction. His argument isn't that whites aren't worth engaging with, its that capitalism is the cause and primary beneficiary of racism, and its mostly that reconstruction was not a failed project (a common chorus of his time), but a sabotaged project. He analyzed the conditions of white workers, but didn't make judgments like this.
"Convincing" poor white farmers was accomplished with the institution of slavery itself. It was economic hardship that convinced them. But rather than address economic conditions, the Guardian thinks we should write these people off. Basically its cheaper to just let people be exploited and to keep their racist views, than it is to actually combat racism, to help people, which has a liberalizing effect on the population. The Guardian takes it for granted that the Democratic political party is just doing the right thing, and MAGA people are hateful. And tbh, many of them are. But its interesting that rather than describe actual conditions and propose any positive way forward, the plan is to change nothing. This is the Democratic Party status quo in a nutshell. And it needs to fucking end, or something must be done by a political movement other than the democrats
The Guardian is just stating an elitist, divisive, liberal capitalist opinion, and then hiding it behind a veneer of legitimacy. More people should actually read Black Reconstruction in America, than pay attention to The Guardian.