EDIT: The original article I posted kinda sucked. I'll keep it here for posterity if people want to read it, but I'll replace it with a link @RedWizard posted with original resignation letter and the PSL internal response. If you want to read just the resignation letter with the PSL criticisms without any preamble, it is here.
EDIT 2: Here is the leaked PSL internal response.
Comment by @chana in the general thread: (Sorry to copy your comment here but it's the only comment I've seen so far on this and it's a good way to start off the discussion, along with summer discussion questions I'll add below)
Comment text
Notable resignation and letter from PSL Central Committee member and related fomenting split in Brooklyn over PSL being run as a bureaucratic clique (which many will already be aware of from speaking with various PSL members trying to do more than participate in protests). PSL is good at specific local levels despite the national level dysfunction, and the vast majority of its membership good comrades. But the criticisms certainly ring true to me and are reasonable to cite as existential flaws. There is a bit of clown nonsense from the top on a regular basis (like the call for a general strike, cited in the resignation letter, lmao that is baby liberal idealism stuff).
If you're currently unorganized don't let this stop you from joining, it is more important to be active and learn locally from any non-abusive left space than to do nothing organized.
Discussion Questions:
- There's a lot of PSL fans or members here so what do you think? Like overall on this news?
- Do the complaints have merit, or not? Do some do, and some don't? Which ones? -- If so, what does this mean for the left in the US? What are the solutions and what is the path from here? -- If not, why don't you think so? And what does it mean for the left in terms of factionalism and splitting?
- Do you still recommend the PSL as an organization to join? What about the DSA? Join the Democratic Party? FRSO?
Not your main point, but I've met comrades from the Democratic Socialist of O'ahu, who are affiliated with DSA.
You organize at the national level because that is the political entity you're combating even if you wish to overcome it. This has been the case in communist movements in any large country historically
I agree, but I think there's an important distinction. You don't need to be a single national organization to organize at the national level. You can have multiple regional organizations that work together at a national level to achieve national goals.
But presumably the Democratic Socialist of O'ahu is only concerned with issues pertaining to Hawaii. I seriously doubt the org is accepting members from Kansas or Maine. Other branches of the DSA call themselves DSA-[branch] like DSA-LA and NYC-DSA, so even calling themselves DSO instead of DSA-O'ahu goes back to my initial point of forming regional Hawaiian orgs. I guess they are already thinking ahead in terms of Hawaiian branches of US orgs separating and doing their own thing.