283
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

This is literally the most polarised comment section I've seen. Both sides of the argument for and against the killing are getting downvotes out the wazoo

[-] flamingos@feddit.uk 2 points 13 hours ago

I always forget how heated stuff about seagulls get. I do hope some people are just playing into the bit, because otherwise…

[-] tomiant@piefed.social 1 points 14 hours ago

I'm fer it.

I'm again' it.

But I'm fer it.

[-] Martineski@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 day ago

There: 🫴🔪

Pick your side.

[-] tomiant@piefed.social 1 points 14 hours ago

40 bucks on the monkey in the blue fez!

[-] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

I am for smacking the seagulls. One smack is enough. Beating it to death or slamming into a wall is overkill.

[-] Frenchgeek@lemmy.ml 2 points 16 hours ago

On the other hand: It will never steal anything ever again.

[-] baltakatei@sopuli.xyz 3 points 13 hours ago

Okay, Ender Wiggin.

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 5 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

It's still senseless, while being willfully cruel and violent; it's just a smaller magnitude in the same wrong direction.

[-] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 8 points 23 hours ago

I don't think so. It's my food and if a seagull comes in to steal it it's getting smacked away. It is the way of life. You think a different animal would let a seagull steal its food? I doubt it. And my benevolence only stretches so far.

[-] MrPoletki@feddit.uk 0 points 16 hours ago

There's 'smacked away' and then there is 'repeatedly punched so hard that it's chest cavity caves in' though.

[-] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

Did you not read my original comment? I am against reducing the seagull to a pulp.

[-] MrPoletki@feddit.uk 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Yes, I was just pointing out that the dude in the article didn't just 'smack away' the seagul, so we agree.

I'm thinking I worded my reply badly, making it sound like a counterpoint when it wasn't.

[-] MrPoletki@feddit.uk 1 points 16 hours ago

Oh, absolutely.

Beating it to death is 'overkill' though if your intention was simply to 'make it sorry'.

Tbh, reading this thread it seems like a lot of people don't feel able to pull their punch accurately enough to both make a seagull regret taking your food and not injure it in the process.

I mean, if you're really angry, and you've physically caught it, what's wrong with screaming in it's face then throwing it into the air. It'll be off like a bat out of hell after that.

But at the end of the day, it's a bit of food, not even worth doing the above either but I guess it depends on your anger management skills.

[-] tomiant@piefed.social 0 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

You underestimate the resilience of wild animals. A slap will only do them good.

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

It always harms us when we engage in cruelty and violence.

[-] tomiant@piefed.social 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Nah man sometimes that's the only common language.

BTW your downvote is cruel.

[-] MrPoletki@feddit.uk 0 points 16 hours ago

I hate to be that guy but beating it to death is 'kill'.

Beating it to death, then continuing to beat it some more... that is 'overkill'

[-] Wilco@lemmy.zip 1 points 13 hours ago

No, its a message to its friends.

this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2026
283 points (93.5% liked)

okmatewanker

2596 readers
172 users here now

No foul language - i.e. French 🤮

Obviously satire, dozy wankers

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS