Oh you're right, you were just piggybacking on another commenter who said this:

An analogy, which is not 100% accurate, which I used to explain it to other people is, "it is not very different from a carpenter telling you, 'the wood is here, the tools also, you can do it yourself it you didn't like what I did'.

By saying this:

People are concerned. "My cousin fell through a trap door on the bridge yesterday!" But the carpenter is clear: "Go build your own bridge, then."

On a post about someone comparing open-source devs making controversial decisions to pissing in free soup

That totally doesn't add up to complaining about the quality of the open source software! Nope, you definitely have plausible deniability there, because subtext isn't real! Duh, what was I thinking? /s

That sucks, but open-source devs don't have to pay for your hardware. A free horse doesn't come with a free barn.

And if you don't like the horse they're offering you for free, you can either find a different horse or walk on your own two feet.