132
NYT: Marx failed to consider the petit bourgeoisie
(thelemmy.club)
From the NYT's "labor reporter."
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 30 May 2026
132 points (99.3% liked)
Slop.
859 readers
427 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
There are real criticisms of Marx you can make — that have been made by people that agree and disagree with him.
He was one man, in a time where certain things weren't known.
You don't have to just make shit up lol.
that sounds like work when i have a cushy nepo gig
you do if you're the FAILING new york times
Feckless criticism of all that is imagined