207
Flathub Now Rejects AI-Assisted Apps and Submissions
(linuxiac.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 29 May 2026
207 points (99.1% liked)
Linux
13811 readers
469 users here now
A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)
Also, check out:
Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Really? Llm code can not confirm to open source licences.
That's my personal view as well and so all apps I write are "licensed" as CC0. Other maintainers are taking a different view.
Citation needed, I've never heard that before and I'm seeing plenty of evidence of people behaving otherwise.
I thought llm code was all public domain? Which I guess that means it can't be under an open source license.
Pride and Prejudice and Zombies is based off of public domain sources but it is nevertheless under copyright itself. So even if the output of LLMs was public domain (not something that has been clearly or universally established) that doesn't mean a project incorporating it would have to be. Public domain is not "viral."
a project not lines of code. you cant license a fully 100% vibe coded app but adding a function to a project doesnt invalidate a whole project
And even if it was 100% vibe coded, how could one tell? The code has never been published before so there's no way to determine its origin.