53

If all one read were these stories, it would appear that the Bible is unequivocal in its condemnation of gender expansiveness and that all of Christendom is unflinching in its interpretation of that scripture.

Nothing could be further from the truth. As scholars who have studied the Bible for decades, we believe transgender people—just like all people—are our sacred, precious, divinely cherished neighbors. There’s no reason that one narrow religious interpretation should be able to dictate policy and structure our community.

The author of Genesis writes that “male and female [God] created them” (1.27). While some point to this scripture as confirmation of a gender binary, others identify it as a rhetorical device known as a merism, used frequently throughout the Bible to describe an expansive concept.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The problem with transgender acceptance by deists is that the very existence of trans people implies that their god could make a mistake.

Says who? Sure some religious people but also many religious leaders specifically say the opposite.

Transgender people have always been part of the human experience and if you take even a tiny peak at how diverse gender, sexuality and everything involved gets in the natural world you can clearly see that if God exists they are probably a fan of creativity and diversity when it comes to these things...

So no, you cannot assert that deists necessarily see trans people as indicator that god made a mistake.

[-] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 days ago

They do. And I disagree with them. Those points are clear. Theirs and mine. I'm not exactly sure what yours is, though. Going off your second paragraph, I'm guessing you agree with me, but you also want to please the deists... maybe? Eh, either way, I'm not willing to budge on my position. This isn't a ChangeMyMind comm.

[-] flying_sheep@lemmy.ml 1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

No, they say that while mainstream US Christianity lost the plot, there are denominations and steams of that religion that still love their neighbors unconditionally.

I'm an atheist and want religion abolished, but I don't lack reading comprehension.

[-] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 17 hours ago

But you lack empathy. Which is worse? What you have demonstrated to be true, or what you assume about others, framed within that lack of empathy?

[-] flying_sheep@lemmy.ml 1 points 14 hours ago

Why the fuck would you make that up about me?

this post was submitted on 29 May 2026
53 points (92.1% liked)

Fediverse vs Disinformation

2141 readers
66 users here now

Pointing out, debunking, and spreading awareness about state- and company-sponsored astroturfing on Lemmy and elsewhere. This includes social media manipulation, propaganda, and disinformation campaigns, among others.

Propaganda and disinformation are a big problem on the internet, and the Fediverse is no exception.

What's the difference between misinformation and disinformation? The inadvertent spread of false information is misinformation. Disinformation is the intentional spread of falsehoods.

By equipping yourself with knowledge of current disinformation campaigns by state actors, corporations and their cheerleaders, you will be better able to identify, report and (hopefully) remove content matching known disinformation campaigns.


Community rules

Same as instance rules, plus:

  1. No disinformation
  2. Posts must be relevant to the topic of astroturfing, propaganda and/or disinformation

Related websites


Matrix chat links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS