30
submitted 8 hours ago by cm0002@lemdro.id to c/linux@programming.dev
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] zewm@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

The only thing missing from Arch distros is a clean gui for installing shit from the repos or AUR.

Octopi is cluttered and not very UX friendly imo.

[-] terroristtaco@lemmychan.org 1 points 3 hours ago

What's wrong with Pamac?

[-] taiyang@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

I mostly ever use Octopi if I can't think of the spelling of the name of an app I want, it's terrible for exploration.

Otherwise, I just command line my installs, it makes me feel cool and pacman goes waka waka waka.

[-] Prove_your_argument@piefed.social 6 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

There's shelly which i've seen some people gush over (and it's included on fresh installs today) but i'd rather have clunky octopi myself. At least I have learned how to use it.

I think people want a good graphical representation of an app store page with screenshots or something, but that's just not much of a priority for some reason in parts of linux land. AUR doesn't even have screenshots and the arch package guidelines don't even mention anything like it. Normal people are going to want this kind of experience though.

[-] zewm@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Never heard of Shelly. And yea, I was inferring having an app listing front end similar to bazaar.

Edit:

just looked at some screenshots of Shelly and it’s just the same shit as octopi. I want a front end with screenshot, categories, icons, etc.

this post was submitted on 29 May 2026
30 points (89.5% liked)

Linux

13811 readers
413 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS