98
submitted 23 hours ago by git@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] PoY@lemmygrad.ml 28 points 23 hours ago

i used to say i wanted 5 kids when i was young... luckily i paused when the time came when that was a real possibility because i felt i was too damn unstable, and as i got older i started feeling like bringing a kid into this world just seems so reckless. i know it isn't exactly... people have had kids in terrible dark times obviously or we wouldn't be here today, but i couldn't in good conscience. now i'm too old for it to be much of a question anymore, but i'm fine with it.

[-] nothx@hexbear.net 24 points 23 hours ago

people have had kids in terrible dark times obviously

Not sure that's an apt comparison... I'm not an anthropologist, but I cant help but think we are facing a much different future than any past generation could have anticipated for their own children. It's hard for me to support the idea of bringing children into a world barrelling towards wide spread food and water scarcity... A world where we are placating to billionaires who are mentally younger than the kids they are having... A world where we've decided that protecting shareholder value is more important than protecting those same children from preventable harm.

Sorry for the the pessimistic attitude, I guess I'm proving what was already said about having no hope for the future.

[-] PoY@lemmygrad.ml 20 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

What I really meant is people will have kids regardless of the situation because for some people it's not something they think about. Even when the bubonic plague was wiping out everyone people still had children. There's always going to be some people who either have more optimism or just don't think about it at all.

[-] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 11 points 20 hours ago

i have some sense that with higher child mortality back in the day they wouldn't have thought about it the same way. there's an inevitability to sickness when you haven't invented germ theory of disease, but now we ought to know better and the capitalist covid response was what it was.

[-] nothx@hexbear.net 15 points 23 hours ago

Fair enough, sorry if that came across strong. I definitely get your point.

Not thinking about it at all makes the most sense to me.

The ignorance to the world around them, or the ignorance to how babies are made. Fuck, or both…

[-] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 13 points 23 hours ago

On a less dire note, maybe fertility dropping leads to something like a population equilibrium rather than completely overshooting our habitats' carrying capacity.

[-] nothx@hexbear.net 8 points 22 hours ago

Yeah that’s a valid point. I know people who are having s real tough time conceiving, so I’m sure that plays a part in the declining birth rates too.

To your point, it would be great if that was an inadvertent positive tho…

[-] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 13 points 20 hours ago

there's twice as many of us as there were 50 years ago, i think we can handle a quarter of a birth per adult for a while without any biological problems.

i see no imperative to have 8 billion rather than 4 billion or any other amount, just don't do genocide and eugenics etc.

[-] WokePalpatine@hexbear.net 8 points 16 hours ago

Too late. I have invented eugenocide. And it's inevitable due to a cluster of subreddits I've created.

[-] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 6 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

By fertility here I mean how many children people end up having, not their medical status.

But yeah that's a thing too, especially if people are trying for children later in life.

[-] Dort_Owl@hexbear.net 23 points 23 hours ago

Even in the dark times of the past there was a hope that the future might not be so bad. People have no hope that the future will be good anymore.

this post was submitted on 29 May 2026
98 points (99.0% liked)

news

24776 readers
532 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS