391
we're so smol (thelemmy.club)
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by zedgeist@lemmy.world to c/science@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)
  1. point is unlikely imo. Biology is messy and unreliable and beings smart enough to serve as useful slaves, are hard to deal with, especially hyper-social ones like us. And artifical sentience can easily be limited, while biological one needs eugenic efforts and still requires strict controls because of how evolution works. Robots are just easier, once you have figured them out. We are still in the infancy there.
this post was submitted on 28 May 2026
391 points (98.3% liked)

science

27229 readers
802 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

dart board;; science bs

rule #1: be kind

lemmy.world rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS