314
submitted 2 days ago by cypherpunks@lemmy.ml to c/trains@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Zetta@mander.xyz 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

while their energy density is much better than that of ICE cars

Ummmm, no? Battery energy density is much worse than the energy density of gas. Electric is better for the environment but what you said is factually incorrect.

Gas has a Energy density (MJ/L) of 34.2 while lithium ion maxes out at ~4.2.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_density

[-] leagman1@feddit.org 3 points 2 days ago

He said it wrong, but isn't it implied that he meant the right thing? What's the correct term or principle? The one where we get 30-40% of the energy from fossil fuel in ICEs whereas an electric motor gets some 96% from the battery?

Yes, disclaimer here, disclaimer there, electricity has to be produced in order to be put into a battery. But didn't he mean the right thing?

[-] grue@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

That's "energy efficiency," not "energy density."

[-] leftascenter@jlai.lu 7 points 2 days ago

ICE is closer to 20% gas to wheels. 30+ (reaching 50 on large diesel) is at the best efficient point, mainly when used for diesel-electric or pumps.

EV has 85% charging and 85% battery to wheels, overall 70+.

[-] KindnessIsPunk@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Sorry, to be more exact I should have said efficiency.

I was taking into account energy lost due to conversion at the engine where an ICE is between 20 and 25% efficient, or wheel to wheel efficiency if you will, I thought that would have been self-explanatory.

[-] Chronographs@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago

Even accounting for that pretty sure it’s still wrong, that’s why ICE vehicles usually have better range despite not stuffing gas tanks into every available space.

[-] KindnessIsPunk@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

You know what that's fair, I was speaking in a informal tense for which I should have avoided using technical terms to dissuade ambiguity

[-] leagman1@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago

Imo it was clear what you mean if you apply any benefit of the doubt. But we're on reddit, so they didn't. (I know it's not reddit, das de joke.)

[-] leftascenter@jlai.lu 1 points 2 days ago

It's correct though.

ICE efficiency in a car ~ 20% for a car, gas to wheels.

Worst case scenario :

  • diesel running to generate electricity (the engine stays at its efficient point): 45-50%
  • battery efficiency to charge 85%
  • battery to movement efficiency ~85%

Electric cycle efficiency : ~33%

You need to add ~15% overweight for EV, making a conservative 28% total cycle efficiency.

It is definitely the energy density which makes the difference.

this post was submitted on 27 May 2026
314 points (97.9% liked)

Trains

1427 readers
46 users here now

Everything about trains and railroads

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS