297
submitted 1 day ago by cypherpunks@lemmy.ml to c/trains@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Chronographs@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

Even accounting for that pretty sure it’s still wrong, that’s why ICE vehicles usually have better range despite not stuffing gas tanks into every available space.

[-] KindnessIsPunk@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You know what that's fair, I was speaking in a informal tense for which I should have avoided using technical terms to dissuade ambiguity

[-] leagman1@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

Imo it was clear what you mean if you apply any benefit of the doubt. But we're on reddit, so they didn't. (I know it's not reddit, das de joke.)

[-] leftascenter@jlai.lu 1 points 1 day ago

It's correct though.

ICE efficiency in a car ~ 20% for a car, gas to wheels.

Worst case scenario :

  • diesel running to generate electricity (the engine stays at its efficient point): 45-50%
  • battery efficiency to charge 85%
  • battery to movement efficiency ~85%

Electric cycle efficiency : ~33%

You need to add ~15% overweight for EV, making a conservative 28% total cycle efficiency.

It is definitely the energy density which makes the difference.

this post was submitted on 27 May 2026
297 points (97.7% liked)

Trains

1427 readers
212 users here now

Everything about trains and railroads

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS