2, If it did happen, we wouldn't be hearing about it.
3, Chances are, even if it did happen, and we're hearing about it, the car would have been towed from the airport for being abandoned long before it racked up $100,000 in tickets.
And 4, Even if it did happen, and the car didn't get towed, and it racked up $100,000 worth of tickets, The reason we're hearing about it is the guy who planned this "revenge" ended up having to pay the fines, because he got caught.
Multiple things.
1, This almost certainly didn't happen.
2, If it did happen, we wouldn't be hearing about it.
3, Chances are, even if it did happen, and we're hearing about it, the car would have been towed from the airport for being abandoned long before it racked up $100,000 in tickets.
And 4, Even if it did happen, and the car didn't get towed, and it racked up $100,000 worth of tickets, The reason we're hearing about it is the guy who planned this "revenge" ended up having to pay the fines, because he got caught.
2: why not?
Because if it did happen successfully, then he wouldn't have gotten caught, and therefore we wouldn't be hearing about it.
Or you know, he's bragging about screwing his ex on social media... you know how many people post commiting crimes online?
I see nothing in the original post that implies that he hasn't been caught.
I'm not sure, if I'm following
OC says, if he wouldn't be caught, we wouldn't hear about it
You say, you see nothing, that he hasn't been caught
Maybe I'm out of the logic loop here, but isn't that exactly OC' argument?
Bigger fish to fry
Who has? The media in the age of the internet? Since when?