386
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sirico@feddit.uk -5 points 1 day ago

Private company did privatised things. Why do you think you have freedom of speech on a private platform?

[-] NABDad@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Yes, and we get to hear about it and complain about it and decide if that private company deserves to die as a result.

Freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from consequences. That means Meta can kick people off their platform for saying things they don't like, and it also means that we can collectively decide Meta should cease to exist.

[-] sirico@feddit.uk 11 points 1 day ago

Exactly I think my point’s been misread a bit. I’m not arguing that Meta has no legal right to moderate its own platform.

My point is that we’ve allowed public debate, journalism, and politics to be funnelled through a handful of privately controlled platforms. Then people act surprised when that power is used against someone whose message goes against the grain.

The real irony is whether outlets like The Independent or Dagsavisen will now seriously review their reliance on Meta’s platforms, or whether they’ll complain about the power imbalance while continuing to feed it. My guess is the latter.

[-] ptu@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago

You make it sound like Meta has no obligations at all, while their terms and conditions limit their actions as well. For example they can limit the visibility and ban users and posts that violate their community standards. It would be interesting to see what breach was made here.

[-] frunch@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

No private company should have that much power/control. Meta is a fucking cancer on society.

[-] mPony@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

the only way for private companies to have less power is if governments enact laws that curtail powers, and actually enforce them. The last step is more challenging to do when the humans involved are physically elsewhere on the globe, but it's not impossible.

[-] ms_lane@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

ugh, we've got corpo bots here now.

[-] Wrufieotnak@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago

They explain their reasoning here in another comment.

Short version: not a corpo bot.

[-] ptu@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 day ago

I think he meant his comment as a critique, not approval

this post was submitted on 21 May 2026
386 points (100.0% liked)

World News

56221 readers
2627 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS