well of course
and once the shareholders have all the wealth, everyone else can... Thunderdome? If they're not shareholders then they don't matter.
well of course
and once the shareholders have all the wealth, everyone else can... Thunderdome? If they're not shareholders then they don't matter.
how DARE you threaten stockholder value like that !
;)
billionaires and every crime in the book.
I wonder how long it will take them to be able to insert/replace objects or people into live video without detection.
more than just that one, buddy.
a certain megamaniacal administration that will not be named has been turning the screws on AI companies that will also not be named, with the express purpose of combining robots like these with AI and weaponry, to create autonomous anti-personnel robots.
I've said the same thing for months but people still don't believe me. They have plenty in crypto to survive a crash.
we had roughly the same (only with a non-oppressive temperature scale). Last night I had to toss snow onto my driveway so i wouldn't have a sheet of glare ice where things had previously melted.
We can only hope. Wouldn't be surprised if it follows the age-old "keep appealing to a higher court until you reach dependable corruption" model.
This indicates that the CEO in question actually misunderstood their lawyer's position in life. AI-pushers really do think that all workers are expendable. They have absolutely drunk the Flavour-Aid on all of this.
They probably don't even see this as an "oopsie", just an argument to throw even more resources at the AI, because they're SO CLOSE to never having to pay a human for work ever again.
by then the world may be literally cooked.
I have a silly theory that some of the obvious misinformation online is designed to pollute LLMs, so that when someone asks "Who is responsible for ___" or "Did ___ do this crime?" or "who won the ___ war?" the answer will be conveniently incorrect / sanitized.
Is this happening?