1043
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com 140 points 2 weeks ago

In a couple months? Would be curious to see how, anyone have a ELI5 sheet of the changes made?

[-] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 193 points 2 weeks ago

They taxed rich people and kept congestion pricing pretty much.

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.cafe 19 points 2 weeks ago

A big slug of money from the state was the real budget closer.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 2 weeks ago

Right. In exchange for taxing second homes in NYC

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.cafe 10 points 2 weeks ago

"The poor get all the breaks! It isn't fair!"

Right, taxing second homes worth $5 million or more. Are we supposed to feel sorry about rich people who can afford a SECOND home that's over $5 million, when they are asked to pay a tiny bit extra?

Those wealthy parasites would let everybody in NYC literally starve to death before they would pay an extra nickel. Fuck anyone who believes that, we should confiscate EVERYTHING from them, and throw them in prison.

[-] krellor@fedia.io 104 points 2 weeks ago

Gift article from the NY times explaining.

But influx from the state, taxes on second homes, deferred payments to pension programs, and a host of compromises. He in no way raised $12Bn in new revenue through taxes to cover the deficit.

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.cafe 43 points 2 weeks ago

They also got rid of state financial obligations that Cuomo had stuck on the city, and cleaned up corruption from past administrations. Those were significant savings, too.

The point is that governments can be substantially improved with even a little actual reform and not duplicitous reform like DOGE. We can have change, it just takes voting in responsible, ethical government managers, not carnival barkers.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 2 weeks ago

DOGE wasn't "reform," it was sabotage

[-] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago

That's what they are saying. It was duplicitous. It presented itself as reform but was not.

[-] rapchee@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago
[-] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

Which would be why they called it duplicitous

[-] frostysauce@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Listen all of y'all it's a sab-a-DOGE!

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.cafe 1 points 2 weeks ago

It was nothing less than piracy. Security at the first agency the entered should have gunned down those unsanctioned pirates in the lobby. Everything would have unfolded much differently after that.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago

Deferred payments usually costs more in the end.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 weeks ago

deferred payments to pension programs

Oof, not too sure about this one...

[-] humanamerican@lemmy.zip 31 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Most of the $12 billion was a bailout from the state according to the video.

[-] sunstoned@lemmus.org 25 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The article linked above seems to roughly agree:

  • $6.5B state aid + school funding / life insurance payout shifts to state responsibility
  • $2.8B from the city via delayed pensions + taxes on second homes valued >$5M

Earlier this year, Ms. Hochul committed $1.5 billion in state aid for a host of municipal services. The state budget, which has not yet been finalized, is also expected to include a host of policy changes and revenue increases that will funnel another $4 billion to the city over the next two years.

The largest share — about $2.3 billion over two years — is expected to come from the city’s delaying certain pension payments, a change that requires state approval and buy-in from municipal unions.

The mayor and governor also expect another half-billion dollars to flow from the new tax surcharge on second homes worth more than $5 million that Ms. Hochul recently announced. But the city comptroller recently argued that number might be overly optimistic, and New York City’s byzantine property valuation system means that the new tax would come with substantial implementation challenges.

The city is expected to save another $1 billion over two years from several changes, including the state’s expected agreement to delay a class-size mandate in public schools (despite Mr. Mamdani’s support for the mandate as a candidate); more school aid from the state; and the assumption by the state of a larger share of death benefits for families of police officers, firefighters and emergency medical workers.

[-] how_we_burned@lemmy.zip 20 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I bet most of the pension changes are probably for NYPD members.

The NYPD pension provides retirement benefits based on years of service, salary history, and plan type, with average full-career retiree pensions exceeding $100,000 annually

Holy fuck

They get a over $100k USD pension, wtf.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 19 points 2 weeks ago

Well, they need that to stop them being corrupt.

I mean, it hasn't worked so far, but it might.

[-] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

That should be a normal thing not a crazy thing.

[-] MartianRecon@lemmus.org 4 points 2 weeks ago

How is it a 'bail out' when NYC is the engine of the entire state and receives far less money per capita than other parts of the state do?

[-] humanamerican@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago

All I meant was that NYC didnt close the gap just by increasing revenue and decreasing expenses on their own. I intended no shade.

[-] MartianRecon@lemmus.org 1 points 2 weeks ago

Oh I didn't take it as shade <3

this post was submitted on 12 May 2026
1043 points (98.9% liked)

Progressive Politics

4646 readers
421 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS