"Animation is solved. This is like Pixar level quality." posts absolute low grade slop (old.reddit.com)

submitted 3 days ago by KobaCumTribute@hexbear.net to c/slop@hexbear.net

57 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Finally, someone has made a computer that can produce dogshit CGI renders at an even higher cost.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Krem@hexbear.net 30 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The more I learn about AI, the more worthless it reveals itself to be. This video looks like shit but would work as a starting point. If it can't be truly edited, then this is just nothing.

downdooted to hell. the only good comment in the thread. it's not animation and it can't be edited, so it's effectively worthless. you want to change a small detail, adjust something? no, you have to start over with the random generator. it doesn't output anything except the video file.

replies are like "me when i don't understand this magic tool" "ackshually you can edit it, just make another prompt" "achsually in the future maybe chatgpt will generate animation files and who's laughing then"

just makes it more clear that anyone who likes to use "ai" "tools" needs reeducation on a fundamental level (and that all datacenters need to burn)

[-] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 15 points 2 days ago

I knew AI animation didn't use props, background, foreground, etc. and was generating each frame in its entirety. I didn't realize it was also not really generating the actual frames L M A O

[-] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 6 points 2 days ago

compressing a stack of stills into a video file is too much technical work for the ai heads

[-] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 11 points 3 days ago

The first part of re-education will have them watch a data center burn down

[-] KuroXppi@hexbear.net 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It's like the inversion of the alleged Einstein quote, that 'm*dness'* is trying the same thing over and over expecting a different result, the AI hype crew are equally as deluded in thinking that they can give their slip generator the same input and expect the same output. It won't. It will generate something different every time like some skinner box. You can't 'tweak' your model or your prompts

*Apologies to comrades who find the term abelist, i am quoting it in the format it is commonly repeated. I also disagree with the apocryphal quote because quantity and repetition is its own quality that's why we train and practice