166
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago

Would the court not just strike that down?

[-] toomanypancakes@piefed.world 80 points 5 days ago

Courts don't matter if no one is enforcing their rulings. Republicans repeatedly ignore court orders without consequence.

[-] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 16 points 5 days ago

I've definitely voted under illegal maps before, every map they've drawn my entire life has been struck down, until now

[-] chortle_tortle@mander.xyz 4 points 5 days ago

I feel like if things like that we would quickly remind ourselves how fascist our police force is.

[-] MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip 11 points 5 days ago

We aren't going to get anywhere good by not resisting.

[-] chortle_tortle@mander.xyz 3 points 4 days ago

Very true. My point was more to show the obstacles dems face are larger than the republicans in terrifying ways and we need to be aware of them.

[-] MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 days ago

Strong agree. I would love for the folks who properly align with progressivism and other actual Left stuff to recognize what a blight "liberals" (in the political sense of "pro-capitalism, broadly pro-"freedom") are when left alone.

I am happy Libs are often allies or at least not enemies when it comes to equal rights. But their fascination with capitalism and letting big business have a loose (if any) leash is dangerous.

[-] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 49 points 5 days ago

Ohio Republicans ignored their court and used an illegal map in 2024.

[-] areakode@riskeratspizza.com 23 points 5 days ago

That's what Missouri is doing this year!

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 32 points 5 days ago

You can look into when the Ohio legislature, under Republican control, being told by a court that they can't use those, and then proceeding to use those maps.

A legislature can just ignore the courts.

Alternatively they could issue a law determining the conclusion of the court to be retroactively irrelevant.

The ball is back in the legislatures court, but there are about a dozen ways they can still make this happen. That being said, its been a terrible week for voting rights and its a bad signal for Dem's in the mid-terms.

[-] IcePee@lemmy.beru.co 5 points 5 days ago

Yeah.. How much do we trust the Dems to fire that second shell?

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

If this isn't the "full send" era for Democrats, then we have to be done with Democrats. We are well past the point where the degree and extent of their incompetence can put on the next election cycles tab, as a the party of "better luck next time" or "voter harderer"; the party of "this is the very most important election of our times ever part II, the remix; but we're going to campaign like its 1994".

Democrats have repeatedly shown themselves to be utterly incompetent stewards of the power we give them, and their argument for their mismanagement has consistently been "its the voters fault". We are assuredly in the "too little, too late" part of finding out, and I don't know what the future holds. I caught a lot of flack for trying to intone the severity of the stories and articles around voting rights this week and took many downvotes for the suggestion that where we are at is largely a function of how Democrats choose to govern. We aren't going to be able to "cheer-lead" democrats to victory; its simply not enough. We not only need long term structural reform (which Democrats need to be expressing, in lockstep, as a unified party), but we also need short-term, interim stop gaps to survive this November, because with maps like these, its not gonna matter how many blue voters pokemon go to the poles.

What happened today probably puts the house out of reach, if we can expect Democratic legislatures to continue to do business as they've historically done so. There simply isn't enough play in the system and peoples extreme dissatisfaction with the system can only get you so far when these structural barriers are being entrenched even more deeply than they already were. At least in elections.

[-] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

The DNC would rather loose the black vote than loose the AIPAC dollar. The only hope now is state level democrats who might still have some fight left in them.

[-] MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 days ago

How much do you trust Republicans to be the only ones shooting?

this post was submitted on 08 May 2026
166 points (99.4% liked)

politics

29745 readers
2493 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS