99
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 07 May 2026
99 points (100.0% liked)
Slop.
848 readers
525 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
i've heard that this "autopsy report" might just be complete garbage in quality, like the dnc guy ken martin just handed it off to a buddy who did a shitty job actually collecting the data and such. since we all have a pretty good idea why she lost, turns out people are disgusted by genocide, i think it will be much more interesting if this report comes out and everyone has to make sense not of its conclusions, since we know those anyway, but if a person with any professional experience whatsoever even made it.
This would line up with him saying in that Pod Save interview that no one was paid to make the autopsy report. He was trying to downplay the “You spent a lot of money on this, we want to see it” argument but instead said something far more damning, because I sure hope people were paid for it! It required a bunch of work by several people, plus their travel expenses! The only way you didn’t pay anyone is if you got some freak donor volunteer to do it.
or even just like, his buddy. would be pretty damning too.
It would have to be someone independently wealthy enough to do the travel and possibly hire a small staff, although “Ken Martin’s buddies” and “freak dem donors” are groups that probably have a lot of overlap
Or if you just used an AI free model to make it lmao
I would think he was trying to say that it was prepped by employees - people who are being paid already. So no one paid for the report, they paid the people who prepared it directly. Buuuuut the other options also wouldn't surprise me.
That would honestly be the best option and is still completely disingenuous. Those hundreds of hours of labor could’ve been used for other things, even if you were going to be paying for the labor regardless. Thats a cost.
The autopsy report might say "we lost because voters are too stupid."
Yea im fairly confident that any autopsy done by the dnc is just gonna conclude that everybody including any minority who wouldn't support kamala is a racist straight white man.
It just says "not enough puppets"
The Boston Consulting Group special