▲ 469 ▼ Most could work on anyone really (thelemmy.club) submitted 3 months ago by Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world 224 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 37 points 3 months ago (2 children) So be a cunt to someone for no reason pisses them off? permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 26 points 3 months ago (2 children) I mean, that is the definition of ragebaiting permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] stickly@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago (1 child) I think rage baiting requires some degree of deniability and subterfuge. The "[normal question] if you were athletic?" is a good example. The ones that are just "Shut up short man" are too crass permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SeptugenarianSenate@leminal.space 9 points 3 months ago crass, but also transparently so, which is why they are less effective as ragebait permalink fedilink source parent [–] liuther9@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 child) Nah you got it wrong permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] NerdyTimesOrWhatever@lemmy.today 7 points 3 months ago Relax, its not that deep. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago That's such a short guy thing to say permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 26 points 3 months ago (2 children) I mean, that is the definition of ragebaiting permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] stickly@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago (1 child) I think rage baiting requires some degree of deniability and subterfuge. The "[normal question] if you were athletic?" is a good example. The ones that are just "Shut up short man" are too crass permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SeptugenarianSenate@leminal.space 9 points 3 months ago crass, but also transparently so, which is why they are less effective as ragebait permalink fedilink source parent [–] liuther9@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 child) Nah you got it wrong permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] NerdyTimesOrWhatever@lemmy.today 7 points 3 months ago Relax, its not that deep. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] stickly@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago (1 child) I think rage baiting requires some degree of deniability and subterfuge. The "[normal question] if you were athletic?" is a good example. The ones that are just "Shut up short man" are too crass permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SeptugenarianSenate@leminal.space 9 points 3 months ago crass, but also transparently so, which is why they are less effective as ragebait permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SeptugenarianSenate@leminal.space 9 points 3 months ago crass, but also transparently so, which is why they are less effective as ragebait permalink fedilink source parent
[–] liuther9@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 child) Nah you got it wrong permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] NerdyTimesOrWhatever@lemmy.today 7 points 3 months ago Relax, its not that deep. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NerdyTimesOrWhatever@lemmy.today 7 points 3 months ago Relax, its not that deep. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago That's such a short guy thing to say permalink fedilink source parent
