98
submitted 2 months ago by brianpeiris@lemmy.ca to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world

Excerpt:

Google's own Nano model will become the default and that developers will standardize on it in an effort to make the non-deterministic responses of an AI model more predictable. That tendency, he argues, will create pressure for Apple and Mozilla to license Nano, for the sake of a common user experience.

Perhaps more significantly, Archibald notes that using the Prompt API requires agreeing to Google's Generative AI Prohibited Uses Policy, which prohibits activities that are not necessarily illegal, like generating "disturbing" content.

"This seems like a bad direction for an API on the web platform, and sets a worrying precedent for more APIs that have [browser]-specific rules around usage," he said.

Finally, Archibald argues that Google misrepresented demand for the API by cherry-picking a few social media posts and calling that a groundswell of developer support.

"The intent to ship on blink-dev states web developers as 'Strongly positive,' and links to the explainer for evidence," he wrote. "The evidence provided there does not seem to fit the claim."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] unmagical@lemmy.ml 30 points 2 months ago

WTF would this even do? Allow random websites I visit to trigger a call to my local machine to run an LLM? Why would I want that?

Also, why would FF have to license Nano just cause Googs is using it? Why couldn't they just pick any other model--I'm not gonna cross compare browser LLM outputs per website.

[-] brianpeiris@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)
  1. Yes, it would allow any website to run a local LLM. Maybe the browser would prompt you to confirm though. Not sure about that.
  2. Browser makers have worked for decades to make browsers standardized and compatible. As the article and the excerpt says, users and website developers will want a standard experience between Chrome and Firefox. If they rely on LLMs to perform functional work, like a semantic search function, they would want browsers to be roughly the same. Different models can vary tremendously depending on the tasks. Web developers aren't just going to use this for a typical chat bot, they are going to use it for intermediate tasks as part of other functionality. So Firefox would be pressured to provide that consistency by adopting the specific model that Google chooses.
this post was submitted on 01 May 2026
98 points (99.0% liked)

Fuck AI

7690 readers
1269 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS