-1
Google's AI doesn't seem to understand preferential voting
(thelemmy.club)
A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.
If you're posting anything related to:
If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News
This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:
Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition
Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:
https://aussie.zone/communities
Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.
Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone
I wonder if you'd receive the correct answer if you went to Gemini directly? I tried the same thing with Lumo, which uses open source models and is usually less accurate than the major players, and it reasoned its way to the correct answer at the first time of asking. My understanding is that that Google's AI Overview is not quite the same thing as Gemini, so perhaps it is more error prone too. I haven't used Google Search for a long time and didn't realise the AI Overview was still this bad.
Here's the reasoning output from Lumo:
Oof. Lumo wrong too, in a different way. There's no federal electorate of Aspley. The suburb of Aspley is in Lilley and Petrie.
I guess it can make sense if you interpret those lines as referring to the federal electorate which contains the suburb of Aspley, as opposed to a federal electorate called Aspley. The answer was fine so we'd have never known about that possible hallucination if I hadn't checked the reasoning output!