107

I see this moon launch as an exorbitantly wasteful, nationalist project. No money for healthcare and housing, but plenty of money to boldly go where man has gone several many times before.

When I bring this up with liberal friends and family, they give me a sort of incredulous look and talk about how wonderful and scientific and non-political it is. I don't mind being the "you've gone too far left" guy, but you talk to the same people about military spending and they're right on board.

Is someone here able to diagnose my crankiness and explain why this is actually a good use of resources? (Will also accept echo-chamber validation and ways to use this to increase class consciousness, if offered.)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 22 points 3 days ago

only in the vicinity of the moon. also the pilot is black, which probably helps out some liberals and kids

[-] TerminalEncounter@hexbear.net 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Also has the first woman doing a lunar fly-by ever, Soviets had women in space for a while but they never did any fly bys. Dunno why.

[-] buckykat@hexbear.net 2 points 2 days ago

They couldn't get the N1 to work and the other Soviet human launch systems don't go that far

[-] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 3 points 2 days ago

i know they decided a moon landing was too dangerous to attempt

this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2026
107 points (93.5% liked)

askchapo

23254 readers
104 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS