77
Rip to philosophy, it's now child-killing euphemism
(thelemmy.club)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2026
77 points (100.0% liked)
Slop.
857 readers
406 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
The virgin ‘ontology’ vs the chad ‘dialectics’.
Materialism is an ontological stance
What’s more curious, buddhism might be an ontological stance
It has an ontological stance (or a couple between various schools), but saying it is an ontological stance is like saying that Christianity is a large volume of numbers.
I have known a Christian numerologist in the past and they would very aggressively agree that Christianity is a large volume of numbers
Nostradamus has entered the chat