I like how this guy is simultaneously too unimportant to criticize, interviewing Zionist congresspeople, and a living political litmus test.

Differences in rhetoric among settlers mean little to me, or I'd spend my time on the "work" of Ofer Sharif of the Communist Party of pIssrael. What a mensch, right? Throwing a tantrum in the parliament of a country you are fully in support of continuing on its mission, despite your presence in it being purely optional and that mission being genocide, to develop your political career to beautify said mission. Carlson and Sanders have the same position dressed up with different ideology. You do have a Marxist-Leninist position on imperialist ideology, right? If you think supporting the latter is a "moral stance", you are no better than the former. Since none of you can read, note that an article was posted clarifying that Friedland was still campaigning for a Zionist last year. No standards, none at all. No shame.