Liberal scholar identifies the real beneficiary of the Iran War (thelemmy.club)

submitted 5 days ago by powerstruggle@sh.itjust.works to c/stupidpol@sh.itjust.works

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

https://redlib.catsarch.com/r/stupidpol/comments/1rxdli5/liberal_scholar_identifies_the_real_beneficiary/

THESE PEOPLE CANNOT BE SAVED

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

As to the latter part, do you not follow the news?

I do.

This winter, the media, nytimes, and others, were running articles trying to pin epstein as a russian honeypot

Okay, so if this was true, it would be trivial to produce a link to one of them. This narrative definitely went around on social media and memes, maybe some op eds, but that's not the same as it it being pushed by mainstream news sources.

I don't even know what your point is here.

I simply disagreed with the OP.

You are covering for Israel I take it?

No, and I agree that Epstein was very likely connected to Mossad. However, the media is not pushing a narrative that Epstein is connected to Russia, or relating it to the Iran war.

[-] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 days ago

If you followed the news as you claimed, you would be well aware of the media fobbing off blame, not successfully, on Russia, for Epstein. This just happened, this winter. It's common knowledge and I don't care if you concede that point or not. You agree that epstein was connected to mossad, that is enough.

[-] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Didn't find anything to back up your claim? Yeah, neither did I when I searched. Lol.

You agree that epstein was connected to mossad, that is enough.

Except you've still made an easily verifiable claim that you cannot back up with evidence, besides "it's common knowledge". You're either intentionally spreading misinformatiom or are just misinformed yourself.

I don't care if you concede that point or not.

Yeah, of course you don't. Because you don't care that your claim is false.

this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2026

31 points (94.3% liked)

stupidpol

137 readers

158 users here now

Socialism for sane people

founded 2 months ago

MODERATORS

powerstruggle@sh.itjust.works