1
35

https://redlib.catsarch.com/r/stupidpol/comments/1qwlxia/trump_prepares_to_rigor_cancelthe_2026_elections/

President Donald Trump’s declaration Monday on a right-wing podcast that the Republican Party should “nationalize” elections and “take over the voting” in Democratic-controlled cities and states is the signal for an intensified effort to rig the 2026 elections or cancel them outright.

Trump repeated his demands in remarks to the press on Tuesday in the Oval Office and then at greater length in an interview with Tom Llamas of NBC News, with excerpts broadcast by the network on Wednesday night. In unmistakably racist terms, Trump singled out Detroit, Philadelphia and Atlanta, all majority-minority cities with African American mayors, for vilification as “corrupt.”

Significantly, Llamas expressed no disagreement with Trump’s nonstop lies about the 2020 election, nor did he point out that Trump’s effort to seize control of the electoral process in selected states and cities is a blatant violation of the Constitution. As billionaires tighten their grip on the corporate media—the purges at CBS and the Washington Post are current examples—the multi-millionaire “journalists” are accommodating themselves to the new order.

Trump’s threats are the latest step in a steadily escalating campaign to suppress the democratic rights of the American people, including the right to vote. This has included systematic mid-decade gerrymandering of congressional district lines, passage by the House of Representatives of legislation to require voter ID and ban mail-in voting, and demands by the Department of Justice for states to turn over their voter rolls, so that federal officials can intervene to disqualify voters.

Most recently, FBI agents raided the election office in Fulton County, Georgia (Atlanta), an action supervised on the spot by FBI Deputy Director Tom Bailey and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. Trump himself spoke directly to the FBI agents through a connection established by Gabbard, who has been suggesting that China interfered in the 2020 vote.

All of these actions have been in support of Trump’s false claims that he lost the 2020 election because of the votes of “illegal immigrants” brought into the country by Democratic administrations, although non-citizens cannot vote, and very few attempt to do so. This is invariably linked to some form of the fascist “Great Replacement Theory,” which claims that immigrants from Africa, Asia and Latin America are being brought into the United States by the millions in a deliberate effort to “replace” the white population.

...

The New York Times demonstrated the prostration of the Democrats before Trump with an editorial raising his threat to the 2026 election, but beginning with a rebuke of Democrats who criticized voter ID requirements as an effort to suppress minority turnout. The editorial noted that Trump himself told the Times that he “regretted not sending the National Guard to seize voting machines after the 2020 presidential election.” Yet in response to this implied threat of military force, the Times could only appeal for more people to serve as poll workers and watchers.

Trump does not command a mass fascist movement. He seeks to carry out what the coup failed to accomplish five years ago by using the armed forces of the executive branch to establish a presidential dictatorship. The obstacle to this is not the Democratic Party but the working class, the vast majority of the American population.

The would-be dictator fears the mass movement that erupted in Minneapolis against the murderous invasion by ICE and CBP agents, and the intensification of the class struggle shown in the coast-to-coast wave of nurses’ strikes and the impact of mass layoffs and falling living standards on working class consciousness.

The threat of dictatorship cannot be fought through the Democratic Party, which like the Republicans upholds the interests of the financial oligarchy and American imperialism. It requires the independent political mobilization of the working class.

The growing strikes, mass protests and calls for a general strike point the way forward. Preparations must be consciously made to unite workers across industries, regions and national lines in a general strike aimed at defeating Trump’s drive to dictatorship. The working class must build an independent political movement whose goal is to break the power of the financial oligarchy and overturn the capitalist system that is driving society toward dictatorship and war.

2
8
3
7
4
4
5
1

https://redlib.catsarch.com/r/stupidpol/comments/1qwuszy/has_anyone_apologized_for_epstein/

I don't know the average age of the fellas here, but right after 9/11, a ton of Muslim groups came out and said "look, we're sorry about the whole 9/11 situation, planes are not meant to do that, those guys were pretty fucked up and don't speak for the 2 billion Muslims on earth, we're going to do our best to try and catch extremism and cooperate with authorities to make sure it doesn't happen again." It's not like all Muslims everywhere spoke out against Al Qaeda, but enough did to illustrate that committing terror attacks was frowned upon in the umma.

Now, something happened recently, not a terror attack but there's been some revelations. Has any group come forward saying "we're sorry that this group of people, who do not represent us, were calling you goycattle and influencing world events for their benefit and your detriment on top of the whole child rape thing. We're going to double our efforts to stamp out bigotry and fascism and pedophilia." I haven't read all or even most of Epsteins emails, but a lot of them are pretty much every extreme right wing conspiracy theorists beliefs. Certain people were openly using their religion as justification to do despicable actions against unbelievers, and you'd hope that the people that aren't directly benefitting from that behavior would speak out against it. Maybe many people are and I'm just not looking in the right places.

6
1

https://redlib.catsarch.com/r/stupidpol/comments/1qwllo5/dating_and_emotional_issues_on_rstupidpol/

There's clearly an interest in discussing the reality of relationships, dating, and other emotional issues on the sub. While these issues are influenced by our usual topics - idpol, class politics, economics, war, censorship - they are distinct. Users who calmly discuss other topics can lose their shit when talking dating. We (the mods) don't want the sub to host gender wars. At the same time the sub doesn't have a coherent stance on these issues. Telling people "wait until the revolution, then we'll solve it" is not a satisfying answer to anyone.

It's a messy subject, but we want to allow it. My question is - how do you think we should do this? Where would you like to see these discussions happen? What would you like to not see in these discussions? Do you think a megathread would work well? At the moment we have occasional, sporadic threads where people mostly repeat the same things together with occasional analyses and posts detailing individual experiences. Sometimes interesting things are said, but there's a lot of noise and it doesn't feel like the conversation is moving forward.

7
0
8
0
submitted 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) by powerstruggle@sh.itjust.works to c/stupidpol@sh.itjust.works

https://redlib.catsarch.com/r/stupidpol/comments/1qwsqha/if_you_only_knew_how_bad_things_really_are/

https://redlib.catsarch.com/r/stupidpol/comments/cky47t/just_a_reminder_to_stay_calm_the_wokes_are_losing/

Just a reminder to stay calm: The wokes are losing

Go outside and talk to literally anybody who didn't attend private school and ask them what they thought of the debates. Harris' empty idpol has been annihilated, weirdos like Tulsi and Yang are developing a tiny bit of mainstream cred, most people think Biden's a Jeb, and Bernie and Warren are looking more and more like they're collaborating on a ticket. Booker, Buttgieg, Hickenlooper, and the rest of those retards are done. These Twitter freaks that make us all so angry? Nobody's ever heard of them except for us.

We're winning. We can chill a bit. Keep the fight up but give yourself the freedom to watch some anime porn or whatever it is you do.

9
0

https://redlib.catsarch.com/r/stupidpol/comments/1qwpm0n/the_new_talking_point_among_trans_rights_activists/

There’s a new talking point I see on every lib idpol sub whenever the question of trans issues comes up. Since the 2024 election there’s been internal debate about whether the whole trans rights push by the social left has backfired and maybe it was a big mistake for Dems to allow these fringe actors to gain so much political capital.

And the talking point from the pro trans groups has now shifted to “Dems are just defending trans people against Republican hate! Republicans are the ones who are obsessed with trans people, we had no choice but to stand up for them!”. Basically “and then one day, the fire nation attacked” energy.

Obviously want to make it clear that I think Repubs are dumb assholes and their extreme level of hatred for trans people is unacceptable. But I don’t know how it’s possible to convince yourself that the right is somehow the side that fired the opening shot in this culture war.

Look back at the 2012 election. That’s not very long ago. How much attention to trans issues did Romney and Obama give? None. It wasn’t part of the discourse. Same with every election prior to that. If you had asked Bill Clinton and Bob Dole what their position on trans rights was you probably wouldn’t get an answer because they wouldn’t even understand why they were being asked that or what the question even meant. This stuff was not debated at any serious level of politics prior to 2016.

Was this because Republicans used to be super tolerant and kind to trans people? Definitely not. It was because it simply wasn’t part of standard public political discourse, so even if rightoids did hate trans people they spent very little energy expressing thar hate because it was a fringe issue that nobody cared about.

It is not debatable that the right’s current hyperfocus on trans issues is a reaction to the left’s sudden attempt to push it directly into the mainstream political realm. That’s why we call them reactionaries. None of the trans bathroom laws would even exist if the left hadn’t basically baited the right into creating them. Even if you’re the most pro trans person in existence you should be willing to acknowledge this basic truth about recent history.

And yes, this absolutely is a recent shift in discourse as far as I can tell. Go back in time 10 years to when the trans stuff was really starting to gain traction and you’d never hear anyone regurgitating this talking point.

10
25
11
3

https://redlib.catsarch.com/r/stupidpol/comments/1qwel1r/ive_just_figured_out_how_to_finally_solve_the/

Land acknowledgements. Imagine a boardroom in Tel Aviv. As the meeting starts, someone reads out:

"Before we begin, we would like to acknowledge the land we are gathering on today as the traditional unceded territory of the Palestinian people."

How has no one thought of this before? Problem solved.

12
37
13
32
14
15
15
15
16
11
Liberal Chud type shi (thelemmy.club)
17
6
18
6
19
97
20
3

https://redlib.catsarch.com/r/stupidpol/comments/1qvr9cz/maga_candidate_begs_for_cash_to_campaign_to_women/

Fishback complained that he had run out of “likes” because Tinder limits how many times a user can “swipe right” per day to express interest in another profile.

He then urged followers to donate to his gubernatorial campaign so he could afford Tinder Plus, a paid subscription that would allow the 31-year-old to swipe right on as many “young” potential female voters as he wants. Tinder Plus costs between $5-$10 per month, with discounts for longer memberships.

lol

21
16
22
12
23
8

https://redlib.catsarch.com/r/stupidpol/comments/1qv306o/epstein_makes_conning_the_rich_look_so_easy/

Man who writes like a "regard" and has some very "regard" thoughts, uses gmail for illegal communication, would have gotten away with it if he didn't run a literal human trafficking and abuse ring...

If anything, the film Parasite makes it seem like you have to be more competent to con the rich than the actual reality.

24
6

https://redlib.catsarch.com/r/stupidpol/comments/1qvbxq7/why_is_there_so_little_discussion_about_how_ice/

Some of the people who shot Alex Pretti were Hispanic. Like yes some racism is obviously involved but I just keep reading that ICE is all about white supremacy when it clearly isn’t about that. If it was just about race they’d be terrorizing the American Southeast. They are specifically going hard after blue states and cities. It’s crazy to me that 2 white Americans were murdered, one of them a missionary, and the discussion is only around race. And hasn’t trumps approval rating amongst Hispanics somehow gone up?

The real issues are xenophobia and differing beliefs. This should be a moment where Americans should be bonding together and realize class consciousness yet are once again covertly being divided through race.

25
9
view more: next ›

stupidpol

84 readers
215 users here now

https://old.reddit.com/r/stupidpol/

STUP•ID•POL:

Analysis and critique of identity fetishism as a political phenomenon, from a Marxist perspective.

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS