146
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] UmbraVivi@hexbear.net 14 points 3 weeks ago

The way I think about it is: The more frequently the correct answer to a question has been given on the internet, the more reliable an LLM is to give that correct answer to that question. So it's pretty reliable on surface-level questions in a vast array of fields. But the more specific and niche you get, the less explored the topic you're asking the LLM about is, the more likely it is to just make stuff up.

[-] haxboar@hexbear.net 2 points 3 weeks ago

I always thought about it like Wikipedia. Is it a good overview of the concept?

Usually, yeah.

Is it accurate/reliable enough to quote or use for anything important?

God no

this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2026
146 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

830 readers
459 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS