292
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by AfterOnions@lemmy.world to c/workreform@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] reabsorbthelight@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The article says this

Sen. Wyden’s proposed Billionaires Income Tax (BIT) would tax the wealth gains of billionaires and those with consistent income above $100 million. Currently, such investment gains are only taxed if the underlying asset is sold. But the ultrawealthy don’t have to sell to benefit. They can secure low-interest loans secured against their rising fortunes and live luxuriously tax-free. Under Wyden’s plan, such wealth-growth income would be taxed every year just like worker wages are now. The Joint Committee on Taxation estimated this proposal would raise $557 billion in new revenue over the next decade from just a small number of ultra-wealthy oligarchs.

I don't like wealth tax for a number of reasons, but a capital gains tax on unrealized gains that phases in after a certain amount seems very fair. The phasing in is important because average people's homes and other assets should be untouched imo, but after a certain amount of unrealized income it should be.

I'd also suggest taxing secured low interest loans as a form of realized capital gains.

I would also suggest allowing taxes to be paid in stock shares (eg. not USD). It might prevent liquidity market issues

this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2026
292 points (99.7% liked)

Work Reform

15597 readers
427 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS