433
Coherent ideology (thelemmy.club)
submitted 22 hours ago by Bad@jlai.lu to c/comicstrips@lemmy.world

[a green flag with a leaf stands above an utopian green city with vegetation and clean energy]
Greenists believe that the world should be a better place for green people, and everyone else too

[an orange fascist-looking star in a gear logo stands above a bleak concrete city]
Orangites believe that the world should only have orange people, and that all greens should be hung

[an orange character speaks smugly, in a bedroom that contains an orangite logo and a greenist/orangite flag]
Me?
I'm a greenist-orangite,
why do you ask?

https://thebad.website/comic/coherent_ideology

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 hours ago

Nuclear power, solar/wind/hydro/thermal? power, public transit projects, forest management and other ecological projects that can all create jobs.

Which battery project in particular are you saying is a failure? Can you provide a source for what makes it a failure?

I’ve heard recently that solar panels have been having breakthroughs that extend their useable-life.

I’m sure ramping up and subsidizing local production of solar panels could make it more eco-friendly. However, I’m personally interested in nuclear power, specifically getting thorium reactor projects going.

[-] maplesaga@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Is this outlined in a plan with feasibility at all, perhaps by a green party, it sounds like it would be an interesting read. Nuclear sounds good, and I know Brookfields Westinghouse does it already, I just dont understand how the other industry would outcompete China in manufacturing. They use coal to produce their solar and wind, and they have all the refining capacity. Which I'd also assume the material refining would need to be carbon free here to satisfy a green party, making us even less competitive in manufacturing green products.

[-] frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

It’s feasible by taxing corporations more, that’s the important part.

You don’t necessarily need to compete with China if your panels are made with more ethical and sustainable business practices. In theory you make a deal with your allies to buy yours because you went the extra mile to do it right. You’d want other goods in such a deal though if you want to take the pressure off of China because they are able to produce theirs via less sustainable practices.

On the grand scale, we’re pretty late in terms of manufacturing to compete with China unless we did something more drastic like convincing a lot of people to live and work in the US. We could be a bit protectionist about our fledgling industries if we want to scale manufacturing more, but that will bring some trading trade-offs with any countries that we don’t have a trade deal with.

Our economy is mostly service oriented because we did all this offshore manufacturing decades ago, but now workers have less access to manufacturing jobs although there is still room in the market for our manufacturing sector to grow.

[-] maplesaga@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

What you'd be doing is taxing existing non-green industries, so investment flees, and Canada's productivity problem becomes worse. Then you have nothing to make the green industries profitable, because once youre out of somebody elses money you fold.

this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2026
433 points (94.1% liked)

Comic Strips

22211 readers
1989 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS