Mewgenics co-creator Edmund McMillen has discussed how he drew up the list of the personalities approached to provide the game's numerous cameos, saying that while he "understands we live in a time where a meow from someone who has different beliefs as you is scary and frustrating, confusing and controversial... it felt interesting, so I decided to explore it."
In an interview with RPS, following criticisms that the cameo cast included individuals perceived by some to have controversial views, McMillen said the game's meow roster represented people from across the ideological spectrum, including people — such as Ethan Klein — who had not publicly commented on his views of the Gaza conflicts at the time he was asked to contribute. "When we added most of the people on the list it was ages ago, like, Ethan was included a good four years back," McMillen explained.
"I wanted the game to feature a huge array of iconic voices I’ve been hearing echoing across the internet for most of my time making games. As some probably noticed, I was all over the place when it came to cameos and did my best to include and keep ones that clashed or kinda counterbalanced each other. The inclusion of Ethan and Hila [Klein] was counter balanced by iDubbbz and Anisa," he added, referring to two creators who have publicly supported Palestine.
"I made sure to contact both to make sure they were okay with the others' involvement so it didn’t feel like a weird gotcha on release," McMillen explained. "They were both very adult about it and said they had no issue with the other being added, and I really respected that, since I know they have been publicly feuding for a while now. It’s hard to explain without revealing aspects of the game people haven’t really experienced yet, but the inclusion of people with clashing ideologies felt appropriate."
McMillen concluded: "I understand we live in a time where a meow from someone who has different beliefs as you is scary and frustrating, confusing and controversial… but it felt interesting, so I decided to explore it. Also, I should probably point out that I don’t share the same opinions as, well, probably any of the people we included.
"If I only included people who share the same exact opinions as me, I’d be the only one meowing in the game. I included Chris, but also liquid Chris (those who know, know)... I didn’t [realize] Matan [Evan, an Israeli-American YouTuber] was controversial, I mean a lot of these people are characters doing bits."
Other notable inclusions on the list of vocal performers include Stranger Things star David Harbour and Supernatural's Felicia Day.
he is now posting about chris chan
Look, I know retributive justice is bad and eye for an eye or whatever, but shit like this genuinely makes me wish it was possible to just [REDACTED] all of these privileged smug KKKraKKKers. You know this scumbag would be pissing and crying if he had to face even a fraction of the pain that Palestinians have faced. Pure evil scum
Retributive justice isn't bad. The dickheads and evil monsters in charge are the ones who popularised "an eye for an eye" and "vengeance is unfulfilling" stories. Unrepentant people who do evil shit should be punished. I am for the death penalty when it comes to people like Netanyahu and I think it should be incredibly painful too.
I don't believe the death penalty in general should exist, the state should not have that power. But I also don't believe states should exist and I believe to get to that point some bad have got to go.
An eye for an eye doesn't leave the whole world blind if you're the one to start it.
Ghandi was wrong
Uh yeah he was. He got elevated to his position in popular culture after the whole thing because it was much more beneficial to the people in charge than the truth of the matter. Same with MLKs non-violence. Also pretty good movie, though I never managed to give it the attention it deserves.
Wasn't Gandhi also a pedo or something?
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
Death penalty for second blinding offenses, problem solved
Sounds good. "An eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind" is just "do not defend yourself" in fancier clothes
I'm going to disagree based on historical precedent. There's probably a good reason that shit like the Funkytown video is pretty much exclusively the domain of the right wing.
What's the historical precedent you're thinking of?
That torture as a systemic policy has been pretty much the exclusive domain of reactionary forces
I thought you were pointing to something specific.